Poor children and my ex-wife

It is somehow sad seeing these flyers. In the cult of Scientology there are many people with good intentions doing bad things. Such flyers affect me a lot.
These children are innocent and happy. They cannot understand, what is happening to them. Their parents are the centre of truth. All they believe in and all they trust in is coming from their parents.

And someday these same children become money hungry beasts and will never realise that their blood/money is being sucked out of them in the same way they are sucking on the life energy of others. Victims become perpetrators.
Children with full potential to succeed in life are trapped before they even learn to perceive any trap. And it is their own parents ruining their Way To Happiness. Today, these children are cute and at the same time I know that tomorrow they will attack others.

Thinking a little bit into the future and I am so saddened.

I am here. I am still fighting. Others are still fighting. For many we come too late. Once innocent people commit moral crimes in the name of the good/cult, they have chosen the side and blocked their own way out. From now on the subconsciousness will prevent these people from thinking objectively. Justifications will automatically kick in.If you want mind slaves – THIS is how it is done! Make them do something really bad. It doesn’t have to be for the cult. It better be really bad for themselves.

Mike Rinder recently mentioned it and I mention it again. Scientology heats up its members like frogs – very slowly. Frogs don’t jump even when they can. And these innocent children sit in the water. You know they only have a very little chance. And this chance is not coming from their parents.

Sad, isn’t it?

I watched some old family videos and pictures today. I and my ex-wife had good times as well and I still don’t understand, how you can brainwash anybody to a point, where victims destroy their family, the lives of others and also their own lives. How can a healthy brain malfunction that much?

But I do understand that people, who have committed crimes in the name of the good, are not able to leave easily. This would make them more wrong than anything else. Sinking with the ship is obviously a better choice. This is the final step in becoming a fanatic.

Why is this scenario hardly discussed? No Tony Ortega, no John Sweeny or Bryan Seymour have reported about this last step.
Here we have the hardcore Scientologists. These are the ones, who never leave and you will not hear from them unless they suffered directly under David Miscavige

Please come forward! We need your voice! Did you commit treason against your family? Did you disconnect and destroy your children’s welfare and childhood? Did you finally leave Scientology and don’t dare to contact your family? Too big overt?
You most likely will not come clean with your family. Treason is a big fat moral crime. But you might come clean with yourself by speaking out. And maybe someone will forgive you someday.

This is exactly what I am struggling with. How could I ever forgive my ex-wife? She attacked me, tried to take my children away, emptied my pockets, ruined my job and the worst of all: “At no point did she inform herself honestly.”
On the other side I am inclined to forgive. She has been one of these children I am talking about.

I still haven’t answered that question to myself. Will I ever get to that point?

 

 

Advertisements

The Telegraph: Small man syndrome at the top of Scientology?

Sorry, I am terribly busy since nearly a year now. My career is doing very well and money is flowing in faster than ever. And all this with Wog technology. My posting activity is obviously suffering.

Today, I found a really nice article in the “The Telegraph”. I studied Tom Cruise’s childhood and I also know David Miscavige’s past very well. Both are pretty small ((rather small than pretty)) and had/have violent periods.

Read these LULS! Mabe we have to redefine “clear” as in “make someone/something clear forcefully”.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/11821572/Small-man-syndrome-really-does-exist-US-government-researchers-conclude.html

Last year at study by Oxford University concluded that feeling smaller makes people feel paranoid, mistrustful and more likely to think that people are staring or talking about them.

Scientology: You cannot commit overts (=crimes) against “Suppressive Persons”

Speaker

“You cannot commit overts against SPs”

This is telling so much about Scientologists in just a few words. Becoming an SP is quite easy. When you are smart and you ask questions, then it hardly takes months to get there.

Now, take above statement into consideration. This is 100% standard tech and fully in line with the Fair Game policy:

 “May be deprived of property or injured by any means by any Scientologist without any discipline of the Scientologist. May be tricked, sued or lied to or destroyed.”

HCO Policy Letter of 18 October 1967, Issue IV

Well, let’s change the topic a bit. I was wondering what would happen if you apply the “blow it up” request:

 When buildings get important to us, for God’s sake, some of you born revolutionists, will you please blow up central headquarters.

Tape 31 DECEMBER 1960 – The Genus of Scientology

The cult was asking the Garcias to follow the rules for internal arbitration. The judge had one remarkable question. Would Scientology ask for the same if the situation had been the other way around? The cult answered this with a kind of “yes” … despite the fact that such has never taken place so far. And the judge bought the story – WTF!

The proper conclusion is that fulfilling the “blow it up” request should also be considered a religious act.

Maybe there is a 70% chance that you really get away with the “religious dispute”. The cult got interested in buildings and you would simply follow the cult’s rules. All you would then face would be “internal arbitration”.

I am not asking anyone to really do this. I am just trying to understand the resulting logic of the Garcia case. How much did the cult investigate to find dirt on the judge that he finally caved in? What overt did they commit against the judge to get such a unique and insulting verdict? No worries – you cannot commit overts against SPs.

Scientology’s Greenfields School – a kind of Child Rehabilitation Project Force?

Greenfields

Grant Hudson, Greenfields school head teacher: “When you get into bargaining about these things [with your children], you also surrender your personal power and fail to maintain your personal values.”

Grant Hudson, Greenfields school head teacher: “Knowing what your own values and morals are and living by them is another way to set clear guidelines for your child.”

WTF? Grant, you sound so reasonable. What you have not understood at all is that life is not just about your personal integrity. Isn’t it about the child’s integrity as well? Isn’t communication better than playing dictator for the sake of your own (and really just yours) integrity. And you call yourself head teacher? That hurts!
There were times when “Child Dianetics” were spreading soft words of empathy. Nothing is left it seems.
Scientology uses the abbreviation ARC instead of love, which means in practice: “Cause fear to control someone and pretend to do the opposite.”

Below are the Grant’s own wordings. Imagine, how children are treated in his vicinity. Please, do not send your children there. They obviously become Ronbots in no time, spending all their spare time to find your hidden evil purposes and never trust in love or passion.
Grant Hudson, you are such a poor guy. How was your childhood? How was your brainwash in the Scientology cult? It must have been pretty overwhelming. I guess you never saw children agreeing on something just because they like and trust you. When you truly love children, they automatically do everything in their power to not disappoint you. LRH once said that the best control is agreement. But he most likely did not mean to make people agree with you forcefully … am I wrong?
Grant, your attitude “I know better and therefore I am your dictator” sucks! With knowledge comes responsibility and not a 3rd Reich. Do you know any democratic values? No wonder your children are out of control and need a shit load of counter intention and counter effort.


Here is Grant’s email, full of love:

Dealing with Teenagers

by Head Teacher, Greenfields School

Does your teenage child communicate to you until you finally just give in?

“Okay, okay, I’ll let you go out if you stop bothering me about it.”

“If you do your homework on time, I’ll let you go to the sleepover even though it’s against my better judgement.”

“I told you yesterday that he couldn’t come over, but I’ll let it go just this once.”

When you say “No”, do you really mean “Maybe”?

Sometimes, to make your own lives easier or because you want to be “friends” with your child (and sometimes because you might feel guilt or shame about something from the past) you might fall into the trap of bargaining with your child in an unworkable way.

When you are unclear about which rules are negotiable and which are non-negotiable, this kind of bargaining can occur. It may resolve an immediate conflict, but can also indicate that you are losing your authority.

As a parent, you have the experience, knowledge, and wisdom to keep your kids safe and make good decisions for your children. Of course, there are times when it is appropriate to negotiate and compromise with teenagers. Where there is no potential harm, power can certainly be shared. Where there is the potential for harm, though, the matter should be non-negotiable.

For younger children, choosing which friends they have sleepovers with, what parties they can attend, or how late they can stay out at night should not be open for negotiation or discussion. Nor should a young child be allowed to choose not to go to school.

When you get into bargaining about these things, you also surrender your personal power and fail to maintain your personal values.

Deciding which rules are negotiable and which are non-negotiable and sticking to this is a first step. Knowing what your own values and morals are and living by them is another way to set clear guidelines for your child.

For more information concerning moral choices see ‘The Way to Happiness’, a moral non-religious code used by millions of people:

http://www.thewaytohappiness.org/#/precepts

Grant Hudson
for Greenfields School

Greenfields Independent School, Priory Road, Forest Row, East Sussex, RH18 5JD

T +44 (0) 1342 822189
F +44 (0) 1342 825289

admissions@greenfieldsschool.com

unsubscribe from this list update subscription preferences

Greenfields School is part of Greenfields Educational Trust, a registered charity, No 287037. © 2015 Greenfields Educational Trust. All Rights Reserved. A company limited by guarantee. Company No 1720639. Registered office Greenfields School, Priory Road, Forest Row, Sussex RH18 5JD. Greenfields is an Applied Scholastics™ School. Applied Scholastics and the Applied Scholastics Open Book design are trademarks and service marks owned by Association for Better Living and Education International and used with its permission.

Evidence: Scientology says: Nicole Kidman is a High Crime

Nicole Kidman’s father Antony was a clinical psychologist – so what?
You don’t know the history of Psychiatry, I do. Who said that? Oh, wasn’t that Tom Cruise. The puzzle slowly makes sense. David Miscavige, the insane leader of the Scientology cult, was strictly against Tom’s marriage. It contradicted the cult policies. He had to get rid of Nicole. David Miscavige used Marty Rathbun and others to indoctrinate Tom to make it happen.

Merriam-Webster defines HIGH CRIME

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/high%20crime

1:  a crime of an infamous nature contrary to public morality but not technically constituting a felony; specifically :  an offense which the U.S. Senate deems to constitute adequate grounds for removal of the president, vice-president, or any civil officer as a person unfit to hold public office and deserving of impeachment
2:  a crime of a serious or aggravated nature

And now compare this with the following cult policy:

Scan0001
Scan0002

And it is not just about psychs. See, who is also on the list:

This third category would include people who are members or ex-members, or in families of members or ex-members of media, police spy organizations and government spy organizations such as the National Security Agency (NSA), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Department of Justice (DOJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), or any other federal agency in any country. It definitely includes anyone who has ever gone to or threatened to go to the press or who has tried to sue Scientology.

I had to read this list roughly 5 times to really grasp what the guy was saying. This is pretty much everybody who is not a Scientologist, not just 2.5% percent. HBO is clear. IRS is clear. But this one: “DEPARTMENT OF JuSTICE”? WTF!
Do you get what Hubbard was saying?

And what is a spy organization? Isn’t OSA (office of special affairs, aka the new Gardians Office) a spy organization?

Feel free to sue me for putting this document online. I’d love to have the Streisand effect.

And on a side note:
Dear cult,
If you do not accept insane people, then you cannot claim to have cured any of them.
You also cannot attack psychs (“Not a single cure”) for not being successful, because they accept people that you deny.
And the funny part of this is that you are not successful despite that fact.

Wins from leaving Scientology

hole

Some of my blog readers know the devastating details of the previous two years. I am very sorry for not revealing all details. Most of them are far more disturbing than what you have read so far. It is not just about telling the full truth, but also about remaining safe in such an insane scenario.
When I google for my real name the word “Scientology” is suggested while I am still typing. ‘Guilt by association’ will most likely haunt me for the rest of my life. Even though it is highly upsetting I do understand why others apply this general rule. Surely I would like to see a clear differentiation between Scientology warriors and Scientology protesters.

Besides my losses I would like to tell you about my wins of leaving the cult. It was by far the better option even though it included losing my job, being harassed and being the subject of colorful litigation.

The most important win has to do with my children. I was fighting for them in court and paid a fortune to the most expensive lawyers. Sometimes you have to lose something or someone to understand the true and full value. In hindsight the cult’s Fair Game tactics have improved my relationship. We are spending time together like never before. All my money that was spent in the cult now flows into their direction. That is an awful lot of money. Music, art, posh holidays, big parties, education and many other things.
I was stingy – I always had the unaffordable OT goal for the entire family in mind. But now I spend money at such a speed that it may look like pure waste. Still, I earn three times more than I can spend for my lavish life.

On top of that I got a big salary rise some weeks ago. This came entirely unexpected. In the end I can call myself a lucky devil for having lost my last job. Who had thought that the Fair Game would end like this? Definitely not me! This period of harassment has been the worst time of my life.

You can see that my blogging activity is not as regular as it should be. The reason is that the targets and demands at work are really high. This makes my job very safe. I do have other blogs as well. They are not anonymous. I realized that success is all about PR. So I keep the blogs running. But how can I solve the time issue? Well, I hired someone else to do it.

I regularly read stories on the internet. Who is not following Tony Ortega’s or Mike Rinder’s page? The downfall of the cult keeps me happy each and every day. It gives me inner satisfaction.

Five years ago I was carrying this strange feeling of injustice inside me. The cult rules were causing me discomfort. I could never be sure if something entirely normal would suddenly become an ‘overt’ (a suppressive act). I knew that reasoning was definitely not the same inside Scientology. Every little thing that would disadvantage the 3rd dynamic would have to be paid with intensives or courses somehow. Let me give the baby a name. It is called “fear”.

I can now think freely and discuss my opinions. Well, there are still some rules, but I don’t mind these. Nobody can get in trouble for my thoughts. Nobody writes any knowledge report. I can trust people around me. They are the most ethical beings of the universe compared to Scientologists.

Since months I do have real friends. I know that these friends will not leave me just because someone else is ordering it. They help me and listen to my problems without writing down an ethics battle plan, knowledge report or repair list. Their help is for free – yes it is!

I got rid of forced communication. I can pick up my phone and talk to lovely people. They don’t call me five times to ask me the same questions over and over again. They do listen to my decisions and they don’t tell me about “secrets”, which I can only hear about on events. In fact there has been no event, no IAS and no regging since I left for good.

Sex has gotten 10x better. My ex was always asking for a touch assist. How sexy! Was this the top of imaginations? Scientology was no fun! Scientology ethics corrects everything. Then you have to feel bad like a pervert. A case supervisor quickly adds some arbitrary intensives. What for? For further revelations to untrustworthy people? The cult is so perverted that you have to pay money to tell them stories they will most likely use against you.

There is only one type of ethics left. And that is my personal ethics. What I consider being correct is correct according to my consideration. I don’t have to justify any purpose, intention or wording.

I can buy newspapers that I want to read. Nobody tells me that this is not ethical. I surf on the internet and I google for David Miscavige’s withholds. This is my right to inform myself honestly. Nobody tries to stop me.

I am a free

Scientology’s insane “High Crime” definitions

HighCrime

 

This is hard to confront. Not for the wogs (non-Scientologists), but for dedicated Scientologists.

You could ask any Scientologist to explain their High Crime rules. In case you would really get any answer, you surely only hear justifications where the answers must comply with the facts. Don’t expect anyone to think freely.
Simply understand that admitting evil would imply admitting to be wrong … which is highly contra-survival.

You’d better admit correctness than ruining your future. Truth does end the past. You cannot spiritually advance by sticking to falsehood for the sake of being right.

If you are a Scientologist. Stop reading now.
You won’t be able to confront Hubbard’s words as they are. Look, don’t listen!

 

Let’s start with some citations today:

 

Blackmail of Scientologists or Scientology organizations threatened or accomplished-in which case the crime being used for blackmail purposes becomes fully outside the reach of Ethics and is absolved by the fact of blackmail unless repeated.

“of a Scientologist or Scientology”
Do you realise that it does not say blackmailing anyone is bad? Have you read the blackmailing stories against members and wogs?

Organizing a splinter group to use Scientology data or any part of it to distract people from standard Scientology.

This one is interesting. The cult alters technology on a daily basis. The freezone accuses the cult of doing so. At the same time the freezone commits high crimes according to Hubbard.

Demanding the return of any or all donations made for standard training or processing actually received or received in part and still available but undelivered only because of departure of the person demanding (the donations must be refunded but this policy applies).

Meaning, they will never repay anything no matter what other policies are telling.

Continued adherence to a person or group pronounced a suppressive person or group by HCO.

If you fall from grace and the cult declares you SP, your family has to disconnect. And all your false Scientologist friends will also disconnect from you.

Failure to handle or disavow and disconnect from a person demonstrably guilty of suppressive acts.

Phew, this makes it even more clear.

Seeking to splinter off an area of Scientology and deny it properly constituted authority far personal profit, personal power or “to save the organization from the higher officers of Scientology. “

Higher officers are always right. You are wrong. And the Sea Org does not officially exist, the same way that David Miscavige is not involved in anything.

Severe breach of ecclesiastical and/or fiduciary duty as an executive or corporate official of any Scientology or Dianetics organization which has resulted in severe harm, loss or disrepute for Scientology or the organization.

You mean David Miscavige’s beatings are not ok?

8. Boasting as to speed of delivery in a session, such as “I put in Grade 0 in three minutes. ” Etc.

We all know this from various presentations: Flag is faster.

Informing fellow staff members and others that one is leaving staff. Where a person is secretly planning to leave and making private preparations to do so without informing the proper terminals in an organization and does leave (blow) and does not return within a reasonable length of time, an automatic declare is to be issued. Should any monies or organizational property be found to be missing in consequence, action is to be taken on criminal charges.

Deep in your heart, don’t you think this is crazy?

Spreading false tales to invalidate Clears or spreading libelous and slanderous statements about the alleged behavior of Clears.

Nice defence. First of all David Miscavige degraded Clears multiple times. Besides this many Clears cannot show that they are clear, because there is no such as a state of Clear. I have not met a single one, just a lot of weird people. Not a single promise in Dianetics was dealt with. Super recollection, no glasses needed, emotional stability etc.

It is a high crime to publicly depart Scientology.

You mean like a football star leaving his club?

1. A person may be summoned to a Court of Ethics or Executive Court of Ethics if it be found that he has gone past a word he does not understand when receiving, hearing or reading an order, HCOB, policy letter or tape, any and all LRH written or printed materials including books, PABs, despatches, telexes and mimeo issues which resulted in a failure to do duties of his post, without his at once making an effective effort to clear the words on himself, whether he knew he was missing them or not, as the source of his inaction or damaging actions.

Very interesting, but what if it cannot be understood, because there were so-called SPs altering the policies and bulletins. David Miscavige, how to solve this one? You pretended to know since years that the scriptures were suppressive.

The charge is neglecting to clarify words not understood.

OMG! Go to jail?

4. An auditor failing to clear each and every word of every command or list used may be summoned before a Court of Ethics.

Oh, yes. The poor guy, who spent all his time and money. This guy had good intentions. And now – within seconds – he commits a “HIGH CRIME”. Not just a mistake – it is a crime!

Any executive issuing an order that certain HCO Pls or HCOBs are not to be followed, where this is proven beyond reasonable doubt, shall be considered as having committed a high crime, and this can carry the assignment of the condition of Treason for both the person issuing the order and the person who receives and executes it.

This, KSW1 and the Fair Game doctrine are a dangerous mixture. Use it against Scientologists in court. You cannot lose the case!

Any auditor seeing a rock slam on a preclear and failing to mark it down and report it is guilty of a high crime, as this injures society, the organization and the person himself.

Unless it was a Mark V e-meter or Hubbard holding the cans. Who does not know the story of poor Otto Roos?

If red tags, per the Examiner’s 24-hour rule, continue unhandled by Tech or Qual, the matter becomes a high crime.

This is a pretty cool way to charge you more, even though you ran out of money. I know red tags very well. I had lots of them. They frequently came when I had money on my account, but the auditing action is not long enough.

1. Abbreviating an official course in standard Scientology administrative policy so as to lose the full theory, administrative procedures and effectiveness of the subject.

Well, what has happened to the Student Hat course? Nothing is in its original form. Still no cognitive dissonance?

Forcing auditing on a pc when he is refusing or protesting it, rather than finding out why the pc doesn’t want the auditing and straightening it out is using auditing suppressively. Any C/S or auditor guilty of this must be handled with group justice proceedings which would include a Comm Ev and could include a penalty of being declared suppressive and expelled from the Church.

This contradicts the “red tag” theory. Eh? You always lose.

 

To be continued ….