How to play Bullshit Bingo against Scientologists

Protesting against Scientologists can be quite exhausting. You could talk to a vacuum cleaner and achieve better results. Don’t even try using any logic. Scientologists are programmed to ignore anything negative. Their ability to listen was lost during expensive courses and counseling.

I have something much better for you. Make your protests exiting with a few printouts. This is going to cause hilarious fun on both sides.

The game is called Bullshit Bingo.
There are two grids. One is for the cultist, one is for you. Please print out both. It is no secret that cultists won’t bring their own grids. You will also need at least two pens.

You may now start a discussion. Each time the person on the other side mentions a word from your list, you can it cross out.

Once you have 5 items in a row, column or diagonal, you must look at the face of the other person, step much closer and yell as loud as you can:


The maximum allowable distance is 10 inch. If you fail doing so within a few seconds, the other person wins.
You may watch the famous Scientology documentary before you leave your home, where John Sweeney demonstrated how proper yelling is done.

Play as long as it takes to get 5 valid items. Sometimes it takes hours, sometimes merely a few minutes.

Wins from playing Bullshit Bingo:

“I could hardly believe how much fun you can have with such an easy setup. It took us about 10 ten minutes; I finally won. This were the most exiting minutes of my life!”
C.N., New York

“If I had known the game before, I would have been about 10x more often on the streets.”
B.S., London

“Wow, wow, wow. I love you. Thank you very much for the unbelievable cool game. What a pleasure!”
M.R., Tampa

“Where can I find more words for new grids? I’d love to play this game on a daily basis now!”
T.J., New Delhi

“The Scientologist got really upset after she had inevitably lost the game. She argued I had not given her any time to drill the game. Her course supervisor coincidently saw us and immediately issued a pink sheet to train more bullbaiting. “Your f#*$&!g TRs are unacceptable”, he said. Within minutes the course supervisor called the registrar and made an appointment while we continued playing the game.
The lady Scientologist said she wanted to play again and we agreed to meet in two weeks at the same location. The course supervisor also wants to come. He will bring someone from OSA as well, he said. This will be the greatest game ever. 4 players in total. AWESOME!”
G.G., East Grinstead

Grid for the Scientologist (to be used against the Protester):


Grid for the Protester (to be used against the Scientologist):



Creepy Scientology

Dear US citizens,

These are your tax dollars used to defame people. You could be their next target.

The cult policies dictate: If you cannot fight the facts, discredit the source.
This is one of the most biased and distorted documentaries I have ever seen and
it will definitely shoot back at the Cult of Scientology.
I am glad that they are not smart enough to stop their behaviour. Thanks for destroying yourself.WATCH HBO documentary on 29 March 2015 – 8pm!


Scientology Freezone in trouble

fyi: WordPress links in this post need confirmations from external WordPress link sources. Therefore some might disappear in the next few days.

There are many groups outside the Church of Scientology. They are on methadone. It takes years for them to wake up and get rid of L. Ron Hubbard’s thought patterns. Why? Because it is easier to not confront the cognitive dissonance. Some people have spent decades in the cult. How could you admit having contributed to a religious cult that long? For many it is easier to hold on to the story.

Don’t get me wrong! I am not saying that everything in Scientology is bad. Some parts are worth knowing.

Each group deals with the cognitive dissonance differently. Some quote LRH like mad and disregard the contradictions. Others simply claim that Ron was good and the toxic policies and bulletins must be counterfeits. The more advanced groups admit that Ron was not perfect. But they face the problem to not know what to keep and what to get rid of.

Tommy Davis once said:

Of course, if it’s true that Mr. Hubbard was never injured during the war, then he never did heal himself using Dianetics principles, then Dianetics is based on a lie, and then Scientology is based on a lie.

Huh, Davis was not aware of what he said. In fact for once he was right.

I believe that Chris Shelton was spot on when he mentioned:

It’s actually in Scientology’s very DNA to destroy itself. (part 1, minute 7).


Chris follows the same path that Marty Rathbun ( was using. Marty was slowly understanding the full picture and replaced Scientology with openness. In this respect he is probably the first real Scientologist. Scientology is about knowing how to know. And Marty finally followed this philosophy of communication and confrontingness.
And Mike Rinder ( His blog is opening up as well … bit by bit. In my opinion he has understood the entire truth already, but he uses all his diplomatic efforts to not be as obvious as Marty. He knows what is best for him and us all. I do believe that Mike is dealing with all people in a very smart way.

So, what is the impact on the Freezone?
In a nutshell: They all will fail sooner or later. Especially the orthodox groups.

Why am I writing this post today?

I was reading the “Milestone Two” blog and got shocked as I realised that some people are really repeating history. They still do not inform themselves honestly and just block information. Can you strip the DNA off?
The “Milestone Two” post was about Ron’s Journal 68 and Fair Game. Bernie Wimbush discusses the “60 Minutes” report about Monique and Marty Rathbun.

Many comments have been censored. More than 10 comments disappeared. There is not much difference to the “The KSW Lions” propaganda blog. Just a little bit softer.

I wrote:

Lana, I am puzzled. What are the facts that I have not taken into consideration? What exactly is “falsehood” when pointing out the time sequence? Am I a heretic, because I do not understand this? Feel free to write a post about it. I won’t comment it. You can censor my words anyway.

Six blind men were asked to determine what an elephant looked like by feeling different parts of the elephant’s body. The blind man who feels a leg says the elephant is like a pillar; the one who feels the tail says the elephant is like a rope; the one who feels the trunk says the elephant is like a tree branch; the one who feels the ear says the elephant is like a hand fan; the one who feels the belly says the elephant is like a wall; and the one who feels the tusk says the elephant is like a solid pipe.
A king explains to them: All of you are right. The reason every one of you is telling it differently is because each one of you touched the different part of the elephant. So, actually the elephant has all the features you mentioned.

The answer was no answer at all. The same handling as the Church of Scientology. If you cannot argue with a fact, then attack the person asking. All I did was giving the link to the Wikipedia chronological history of Fair Game. The time sequence indirectly explains the context of Ron’s Journal 68. I know that this is hard to confront. But should I therefore hide the facts? Are we still applying the same Scientology after leaving the cult?

Jim Logan’s answer was (in case it was any answer):

Your name is based on a book that has been shown clearly to be riddled with falsities. A cornucopia of dreck. Here is a website that is factual, and belies Miller’s “work”. If you had a real intention to know the facts, you’d have this website as part of your evaluation data.

Well, I don’t see the point in having a discussion with a fanatic. This guy hasn’t even studied the Student Hat very well. You cannot learn anything when you are convinced to know it already. My name is obviously wrong. So my original statement “Fair game took place after Ron’s Journal 68” and the Wikipedia link were removed. Remarkably Brian’s critical comments are still on the post. He was probably having weak arguments, no critical facts.

Besides not being censored, he was also attacked by Jim Logan … not for his name though.

Brian, Now aren’t you the same fella that posts on one of the Scn hate sites, daily.

I don’t know who Jim Logan is. To me he seems to be a fanatic OSA type guy working in the Freezone (Independent movement). I might be wrong. But what I can clearly say is that he seems to be one of the people bringing death to the Freezone. If you don’t stop behaving like the Church of Scientology, then upset people will haunt you the same way they haunt the cult. My advice is to follow the path of communication and confrontingness.

Lies create a future, truth ends the past. Isn’t that Scientology? Apply it! You cannot go OT with a confrontingness of a mouse.

Religious game


Alea iacta est.

This is not a religious dispute according to Judge Waldrip. We are talking business! The game is slowly turning against the Chairman of the Board. David Miscavige’s version of a “Fair Game” is over. Marty is threatening the kingpin. No! This is wrong. Indeed it is Monique. She is not even part of the religious board, because she has never been inside Scientology. Nevertheless, she is also dangerously close to Miscavige and he cannot kick her off the playing field. How cool is that? She is not on it.
As soon as a pawn arrives on the other side a new chess piece will appear. I guess this piece is called IRS. Right now it sucks to be David Miscavige.

What will happen next?


Scientology: “YOUR way out” manual


If you have recently left the Church of Scientology then you have two paths to choose from. You can open one or two eyes.
Let’s walk up the bridge according to Hubbard’s grade chart (

  • -9 Suffering
    You are in a really bad state. You have no clue what is going wrong.
  • -8 Despair
    You don’t know what to do. The ethics officer helps you.
  • -7 Ruin
    All your money is gone. You have left your family.
  • -6 Effect
    Your family is attacking you.
  • -5 Fear of Worsening
    You fear to not make it up the bridge. You are f…..g PTS.
  • -4 Need of Change
    You try to handle your enemies, but it is their overts. So what can you do?
  • -3 Demand for Improvement
    You are taking responsibility and try to solve the situation without the ethics officer.
  • -2 Hope
    Finally there is hope for betterment.
  • -1 Help
    You try to help your family. They have to accept your/the only path of spiritual enlightenment.
    And your family tries to help you to face their truth.
  • 1 Recognition
    You get an idea of what these SPs are talking about.
  • 2 Communication
    You start listening to them and surfing in the internet.
  • 3 Perception
    You read and hear wild stories, you are confused. These are all lies!?
  • 4 Orientation
    You sort the stories and filter false information.
  • 5 Understandings
    The stories start making sense.
  • 6 Enlightment
    You run away.

Path one: From here on you can stick to Scientology and eg. join the freezone (eg., Ron’s Org (eg. or the independent movement ( Ursula Caberta sometimes called these “Methadone”.

Path two: You start researching. It took me roughly 750 hours of study to get a precise picture of Scientology. There is a lot of rubbish out there. Nevertheless you have to keep on reading! You must not stop in the middle! Otherwise you won’t get enough data to make up your mind properly.

If you believe that you don’t have enough time to investigate that much, then I have a quick two-week list for you.
This study list has a VERY HIGH gradient. Therefore the data will sound weird to you. You are still thinking in the Cult patterns! Be patient, keep on studying! The following data is right on spot. You will understand the full picture later on. There is a lot to know. No worries, you will make it through the jungle.

  1. Realise that Scientology was built to make you right and the Wogs wrong.
  2. Then also realise that Scientology was built to make you wrong and the leader (Hubbard or David Miscavige) right.
    Someday you will know that policies and bulletins were written with background information that you can only fully understand by knowing Hubbard’s biography. Control, money, deception … not what you expect right now.
  3. Read the “Gold Info Pack” that you can eg. download here
    Don’t be scared. You will not get sick reading any OT data. This was a lie. Nobody has ever gotten sick by it – unless by coincidence.
    If you are OT III or higher you should also read “Revolt in the Stars” now.
  4. Listen to Pete Griffiths interview on YouTube. That is a really compact summary. This is condensed data. Although he is talking nonstop for over an hour there is still missing a lot.
    Yes, this is another high gradient! But if you study slower you won’t make it in a week or two.
  5. Read “Bare-Faced Messiah” by Russell Miller. It is freely available on the internet.
    or eg. in German  (Unfortunately the interviews were not translated into German.)
  6. Now you can watch “The Profit”. You might recognise some actors if you already have some internet background.
    Thank you Bob Minton! Rest in peace. ( ,

    This movie is very well told. The precision obviously is not as good as you would like it to be. Especially the last 30 minutes are just trying to give an idea about Hubbard’s personality rather than being historical. The end of the story is definitely not as close to Hubbard as it is at the beginning.

  7. Take a rest.
  8. Re-study all tapes, bulletins and policies in the new context.
  9. In the past you were trying to argue with Hubbard’s scriptures. I guess you have now started thinking for yourself.

… Where is Shelly? … Where is LRONMAN? …


This post is dedicated to Mike Rinder. He astonished me in a good way. See below where I copied his blog comment.
We know where that Shelly is, but where is L. Ron Hubbard?
Mike’s answer was/is a taboo inside the cult. Times have changed. So we finally get an honest answer on his blog. You have no clue how relieving that is after having been confronted with threats for a long time for asking the wrong questions.

It is absolutely correct to admit that L. Ron Hubbard was not perfect. An open dialogue is the only way to keep parts of Scientology alive. So Mike does – like Marty Rathbun – a great job.
We are not of the same opinion regarding Hubbard, but in general I think it is highly important to have different opinions in society. We all must be open-minded for new information. It is an important piece in the evolution of mankind. And I do not care what Hubbard said about open-minded people being PTS.

I want to thank Mike for this post and indirectly ask for more.

My personal opinion was written down here:

Mike’s view can be found here:

I want to put emphasis on his comment about LRH’s death. Actually this is not new information. What makes it so important this time, is that it was said by Mike,
who would have disgraced people in the past when he was Executive Director OSA (Office of Special Affairs, for saying what he is saying now.

22nd August 2013, 16:34
Michael Rinder:
“FL _ I was never asked that question. I guess in some respects I believed that would be the case, though I never saw anything written by him that specifically stated that he would return in a different body, though there were certainly rumors about him having left instructions about how he could be identified. Perhaps they were true. Do I think he has the capability of returning? Not in those terms. I believe that one lives for more than one life with more than one body. But the fact is, after this long, he has not “returned” as “Ron in a new body.” And I place great credence in what Sarge said about the later years of his life. There are simply too many other facts that align to the notion that he was NOT in fact in good shape and certainly was not “causatively discarding his body to continue research that would be hindered by a body.” If this was the case, there would have been a LOT more detailed hat write ups and turnovers and farewell messages — even a film or video. A lot of things I took as “gospel” from the time I was young concerning the infallibility of LRH I no longer see that way. Including this idea that he could knowingly postulate a future body and identity and return with full recall of his last lifetime.”