How to play Bullshit Bingo against Scientologists

Protesting against Scientologists can be quite exhausting. You could talk to a vacuum cleaner and achieve better results. Don’t even try using any logic. Scientologists are programmed to ignore anything negative. Their ability to listen was lost during expensive courses and counseling.

I have something much better for you. Make your protests exiting with a few printouts. This is going to cause hilarious fun on both sides.

The game is called Bullshit Bingo.
There are two grids. One is for the cultist, one is for you. Please print out both. It is no secret that cultists won’t bring their own grids. You will also need at least two pens.

You may now start a discussion. Each time the person on the other side mentions a word from your list, you can it cross out.

Once you have 5 items in a row, column or diagonal, you must look at the face of the other person, step much closer and yell as loud as you can:


The maximum allowable distance is 10 inch. If you fail doing so within a few seconds, the other person wins.
You may watch the famous Scientology documentary before you leave your home, where John Sweeney demonstrated how proper yelling is done.

Play as long as it takes to get 5 valid items. Sometimes it takes hours, sometimes merely a few minutes.

Wins from playing Bullshit Bingo:

“I could hardly believe how much fun you can have with such an easy setup. It took us about 10 ten minutes; I finally won. This were the most exiting minutes of my life!”
C.N., New York

“If I had known the game before, I would have been about 10x more often on the streets.”
B.S., London

“Wow, wow, wow. I love you. Thank you very much for the unbelievable cool game. What a pleasure!”
M.R., Tampa

“Where can I find more words for new grids? I’d love to play this game on a daily basis now!”
T.J., New Delhi

“The Scientologist got really upset after she had inevitably lost the game. She argued I had not given her any time to drill the game. Her course supervisor coincidently saw us and immediately issued a pink sheet to train more bullbaiting. “Your f#*$&!g TRs are unacceptable”, he said. Within minutes the course supervisor called the registrar and made an appointment while we continued playing the game.
The lady Scientologist said she wanted to play again and we agreed to meet in two weeks at the same location. The course supervisor also wants to come. He will bring someone from OSA as well, he said. This will be the greatest game ever. 4 players in total. AWESOME!”
G.G., East Grinstead

Grid for the Scientologist (to be used against the Protester):


Grid for the Protester (to be used against the Scientologist):


The Telegraph: Small man syndrome at the top of Scientology?

Sorry, I am terribly busy since nearly a year now. My career is doing very well and money is flowing in faster than ever. And all this with Wog technology. My posting activity is obviously suffering.

Today, I found a really nice article in the “The Telegraph”. I studied Tom Cruise’s childhood and I also know David Miscavige’s past very well. Both are pretty small ((rather small than pretty)) and had/have violent periods.

Read these LULS! Mabe we have to redefine “clear” as in “make someone/something clear forcefully”.

Last year at study by Oxford University concluded that feeling smaller makes people feel paranoid, mistrustful and more likely to think that people are staring or talking about them.

Scientology Leader’s 8+2 dynamics … survive !



Ok, this is not a spider web even though it would be a good metaphor. What you see are David Miscavige’s 10 dynamics. I originally planned the picture as a planetary system where everything revolves around our dear leader.

Whatever approach would have been the best, all have one point in common. In the centre of the universe we have DM himself. His life consist of 8+2 dynamics.


First dynamic

This can only be the sun, nothing else would fulfill our expectations of greatness. And no, this is not DM’s halo. There is no halo that could shine bright enough.


Second dynamic

His family? No way! They have all abandoned DM. The only 2D cool aid drinker, in case she is not in “the hole” yet, is DM’s Communicator Laurisse Henley-Smith (formerly Stuckenbrock). She is his second dynamic, replacing Shelly, who somehow locked herself up very well.

This is not a sex dynamic. It is creativity to get along with life, which is surrounded by SPs.

Come on, from what I know about DM, I guess he is impotent. Even according to Hubbard’s standards he must be impotent. Sex is disgusting. And I tell you what: IT IS GOOD AS IT IS. Imagine there would be a kind of second Mini-Me following his footsteps. We have seen really bad constellations in North Korea. Thank God!


Third dynamic

This should be the entirety of Scientologists, which is not the case. DM’s third dynamic is a kind of cash dynamic. The IAS cannot be very far.

Oh, and we can also find the Sea Org Members here. The penguins are very crowded. There is plenty of space in each Ideal Org. Nevertheless, they have to share beds. Food is also an issue. Sea Org members are cheaper than slaves. They work harder than slaves. They are the most frugal slaves of the entire universe. This ‘unprecedented’ value makes them perfect beings. Did you know the IAS slogan: “We are the IAS”

Someone has to be it. According to LRH, the word “we” is suppressive anyway. It is a terrible generalisation, because the truth is that “we” only stands for one person and that is David Miscavige.


Fourth dynamic

Mankind, although there is nothing “kind” here. These are all important people on earth that are not aberrated (=insane) and have good statistics. They are the homo novis. A world without insanity actually means to be like Scientology’s celebrities. Someone, who can lie like Kirstie Alley or jump like Tom Cruise.

Imagine, we would all be like these celebrities. I am wondering, who would produce telephones, cars, software, newspapers, trains and all the other things in this perfect world? If we were all actors or musicians then there wouldn’t even be a camera man.


Fifth dynamic

This is the animal dynamic. We find some really dedicated sheeple here. How many? Dunno, not many are left. They were cuddled too much and died during the harsh winters, because they had no fur.

These sheeple are very special. They are not only providing exceptionally amounts of wool, they also provide milk, and some of them can be used as ‘raw meat’.

Btw. The sheep on the left is PTS.

Did you spot the whale? I had to add at least one. You would expect that they occupy 3 or 4 dynamics simultaneously. Their value is much higher as the value of classical members with their miraculously depleted bank accounts. Abilities and achievements are all measured in money units. In an event you are only allowed to sit in the front after donating more than any other person. It does not matter if you have audited for 10,000 hours, sold 5,000 books or disseminated to 500 new sheeple, who did actually show up.

However, when the time has come, even big whales are kicked out overnight (disposed quietly without sorrow) no matter how much they have contributed.

What would DM do without the whales? Maybe some less ebony in his designer loo?

Staff are quite stressing for David Miscavige. They are more likely to be exposed to entheta. Therefore their value is way lower than the one of Sea Org members. You need 10 people on staff for one Sea Org member, who hardly sleep and don’t ask so many question.
Try to spot some employees on my picture. It is the absence that counts. You could argue that they are represented by the black sheep on the left, which is PTS.


Sixth dynamic

MEST – these are basically buildings. They are like mushrooms popping out of the soil. Most of them are imaginary, because reopening a building isn’t really the same as opening a building. But for DM this is justifiable. These are monuments of his power. They prove the growth and mighty OT abilities that are inherent in his holy beingness. He doesn’t even need auditing or sec-checks.

And now find Mother Earth. She is freaking big, isn’t she? Somewhere in the corner of this picture to properly express her importance. Her shape is a little bit eggy. This is how DM perceives the planet he is standing on. As the pope of the fastest growing religion worldwide he is the only one to understand the symbiosis between Mother Earth and Scientology. There is this one important reason why we have to save our world – we must save his buildings. Who cares about mankind and thetans? Buildings are the highest imaginable urge towards survival.


Seventh dynamic

OT IX and OT X. Well, Miscavige knows that they do not exist. This is more or less a mandatory dynamic. Without seeking for survival on this dynamic his sheeple would run away. Therefore, even though this dynamic does not exist, its illusion must exist. Understood?
The seventh dynamic is the survival as a spiritual being. And what could be better than placing OT IX and OT X here?

There are two ghosts on the picture. Each one represents a non-existing OT level. Guess what! The cat will never be let out of the bag.


Eighth dynamic

The God dynamic. This one has only been defined rudimentary by the founder. So there is no issue with slowly undefining it. LRH’s words become less and less important. DM knows how to alter everything and everyone … especially everyone. You will never be the same again! The missing LRH astral body on the picture has been edited audited away.


Ninth dynamic

Aesthetics!!! This is the exclamation mark dynamic! Every Scientologist uses it frequently and without any discipline!!!!!!!


Tenth dynamic

Ethics? This is a pure LOL dynamic for Miscavige. There is no such as Ethics in the life of a lunatic. What did you think? LOL stands for the highest urge towards survival of pleasure.

The right question?


Picture: Lisa McPherson, before and after her disaster at the cult of Scientology


I was wondering if there is any precise series of questions to make a Ronbot (=Scientologist/robot) think. In a previous post “The right question. My ex and I.” I mentioned some thoughts about the DOs and DON’Ts when talking to Scientologists.

Last week I met a Scientologist in London. It was really easy to recognise him. His words were not from this world – just the typical Scientology mumbo-jumbo. He surely is one of the really deep brainwashed ones. Who else would talk to wogs (=non Scientologists) in a language that they cannot understand?

I coincidentally came up with an idea when I answered the question: “Where are you from?”
“I am from the Netherlands – the land of drug abuse.”

We discussed some drugs and I asked if he was against psychiatric abuse. I guess I don’t need to tell his answer. A bit Q&A here and there, then I humorously followed-up if he was also against child abuse in the Netherlands. It was more of a rhetorical question. “Not just in the Netherlands” he replied with confidence.

So, I summarised that abuse must be generally bad then. I said: “Hypothetically, if I had a real abuse situation at work, would you support me and help fighting against it?”
“Sure, if I could” he mumbled. He must have had an uneasy sense by then.

I explained that this was actually happening. Someone at work was harassed by the Church of Scientology. Consequently his family was falling apart. He urgently needed help.
Haha, you should have seen his sudden comm-lags (=slowing down, pausing, hesitation).
I quickly invented a full-blown story, similar to ones from the internet. He listened and did not run away.

Poor guy, I am pretty certain that he was three feet behind his head at that time.

Ok, ok. This never happened … I made the entire story up. Today’s post is not real. But it could have happened – you see? It is up to you to check this strategy out. I will also use my next opportunity to see if it works. I am pretty sure that it will. There are many ways to properly talk to Scientologists. You don’t have to harass them. Use the right words and make them think. They have not done this for quite a while, so be patient.

Wake them up!

The steps could be:
a) Are you against psychiatric abuse?
b) Are you against child abuse?
c) Obviously we all are against abuse in general.
d) Would you help me if I was abused?
e) Not me, but I know someone ……
f) Scientology abusing people. What? You did not know this? How come? Stories are all over the internet.

In a nutshell: Use the Kool-Aid drinker buttons.

“How to beat your wife” manual. A lesson for Scientology leader David Miscavige.


How to beat your wife – seriously, this is not funny! The answer could be as simple as: “Don’t beat your wife”.
But this is not the answer. Some people obviously teach how to beat others using 100% Standard Technology. And they don’t even realise how fu…. up their mind is. How can such people sit there with a smile and a clear conscience? Is it because they think that something is ok when it is written down by a master?

According to the founder of Scientology (science fiction writer L. Ron Hubbard) people learn in gradients. You cannot bypass a step. If your progress is too fast, then you cannot progress at all – got it?

A murderer would only kill half a person
, and the next time a quarter person. Someday he is able to stop murdering at all. This is called learning by gradients. And the Hubbard dogma makes it possible: “There are no absoluta”. No worries if you are confused now. I am just a bit sarcastic.

The above YouTube could be a good lesson against Miscavige’s beating behaviour. It is a well defined step (gradient) out of his slappiness. And Miscavige’s friend Louis Farrakhan from the Nation of Islam could help him, who knows.

This post is under the category LULZ. But to be honest, I don’t see any LOL in here. It just raises questions upon questions.
Maybe Slap-Master Miscavige just needs a GAT II Scientology course with the title: “How to make people disappear effectively”.

Btw. where is Shelly Miscavige?



Would you believe that the European woman in our times yearns for a husband who would be like a guardian to her. I would like to provide the viewers with some statistics. 90 percent of British women do not want to marry a weak man, who sits down and cries the moment there is a problem.
They say: No, such a man looks more like a woman. We want a manly man. Wife beating is a serous accusation (leveled against Islam).
Let us examine this matter bit by bit.

Cleric Sa’d Arafat:
Allah honored wives by instating the punishment of beatings.

Honored them with beatings? How is this possible?

Cleric Sa’d Arafat:
The Prophet Muhammad said: “Don’t beat her in the face, and do not maker her ugly.” See how she is honored. If the husband beats his wife, he must not beat her in the face. Even when he beats her, he must not curse her. This is incredible! He beats her in order to discipline her. In addition, there must not be more than ten beatings, and he must not break her bones, injure her, break her teeth, or poke her in the eye. There is a beating etiquette. If he beats to discipline her, he must not raise his hand high. He must beat her from the chest level. All these things honor the woman.

She is in need of disciplines.

How should the husband discipline her? Through admonishment. If she is not deterred, he should refuse to share the bed with her. If she is not repentant, he should beat her, but there are rules to the beating. If is forbidden to beat her in the face or make her ugly. When you beat her, you must not curse her. Islam forbids this.

With what should he beat her? With his bar hand? With a rod?

Cleric Sa’d Arafat:
If he beats her, the beatings should not be hard, so that they do not leave a mark. He can beat her with a short rod. He must avoid beating her in the face or in places in the head where it hurts. The beatings should be on the body and should not come one right after the other. These are all choices made during the process, but beatings are allowed only as a last resort. The honoring of the wife in Islam is also evident in the fact that the punishment of beating is permissible in one case only: when she refuses to sleep with him.

When she refuses to sleep with him?

Cleric Sa’d Arafat:
Yes, because where else could the husband go? He wants her, but she refuses. He should begin with admonishment and threats…

Allow me to repeat this, A man cannot beat his wife …  over food or drink.

Cleric Sa’d Arafat:
Beating are permitted only in this case, which the husband cannot do without.

OJ Simpson about Scientology, Oh Dear Simpson, OMG Simpson.



  • We are the most ethical beings on earth.
  • 100% Standard Tech
  • Reducing crime rate by 50%+
  • A clear has full and perfect recall of every moment.
  • Psychiatry? Not a single cure!