Louis Farrakhan has no idea about Dianetics and Scientology

 

I have seen so many people clapping their hands, having epiphanies and cheering with insane glee. Isn’t it frightening what religions are capable of? People in the audience fall down, because they just felt the lord and had the strongest orgasm ever? I wish this was a joke. The human psyche is easy to manipulate. How many Scientologists belong to this weak psyche group? I don’t really have numbers. But I would guess it must be 97.5% according to Hubbard. The remaining 2.5% cannot be manipulated or have just woken up … who knows?

Watch above YouTube video. Louis Farrakhan scares the shit out of me! Is there any common sense? He just needs to distort the logic and give new definitions. Farrakhan is a disciple of Hubbard, who was a disciple of Aleister Crowley … NO WONDER!

Listen to Farrakhan’s words about Dianetics (Scientology) starting at 16 minutes and 14 seconds. People are cheering, they obviously do not understand, what the guy in front of them is preaching. If Farrakhan would know Scientology better, he would know what Hubbard said about demons and Jesus. It makes clear that Farrakhan is a Dianetics idiot. He doesn’t even know what he says. Is he a kind of OJ Simpson, who just talks for the sake of it?

 “So the criticism … well, you know, Mr Hubbard was a racist. I don’t know that. I don’t know that. And I wouldn’t care. (18:32)”

Doesn’t that contradict his entire speech? What type of pot is this guy smoking?
Dianetics is about letting the past go. But Farrakhan has a better definition:

“Sibling: Get over it.
Farrakhan: Get over what?
Sibling: You can’t keep talking about what happened yesterday.
Farrakhan: Hell, what happened yesterday is what is driving your madness today! (20:52)”.

Somehow Farrakhan twists the words and tells his people to stick to the past. Mhmmmmm? For sure this has nothing to do with forgiveness or “The psychotic lives in the past, the insane in the present time, and the sane in the future (L. Ron Hubbard)” … unless you try to get over it by erasing madness with Dianetics?

“How could I see something that valuable and know the HURT AND SICKNESS OF MY PEOPLE and not offer it to them? (18:15)”

Wake up audience! He just called you sick like Hubbard did. Don’t you think it is condescending?

Advertisements

“How to beat your wife” manual. A lesson for Scientology leader David Miscavige.

  

How to beat your wife – seriously, this is not funny! The answer could be as simple as: “Don’t beat your wife”.
But this is not the answer. Some people obviously teach how to beat others using 100% Standard Technology. And they don’t even realise how fu…. up their mind is. How can such people sit there with a smile and a clear conscience? Is it because they think that something is ok when it is written down by a master?

According to the founder of Scientology (science fiction writer L. Ron Hubbard) people learn in gradients. You cannot bypass a step. If your progress is too fast, then you cannot progress at all – got it?

A murderer would only kill half a person
, and the next time a quarter person. Someday he is able to stop murdering at all. This is called learning by gradients. And the Hubbard dogma makes it possible: “There are no absoluta”. No worries if you are confused now. I am just a bit sarcastic.

The above YouTube could be a good lesson against Miscavige’s beating behaviour. It is a well defined step (gradient) out of his slappiness. And Miscavige’s friend Louis Farrakhan from the Nation of Islam could help him, who knows.

This post is under the category LULZ. But to be honest, I don’t see any LOL in here. It just raises questions upon questions.
Maybe Slap-Master Miscavige just needs a GAT II Scientology course with the title: “How to make people disappear effectively”.

Btw. where is Shelly Miscavige?

 

Transcript:

Commentator:
Would you believe that the European woman in our times yearns for a husband who would be like a guardian to her. I would like to provide the viewers with some statistics. 90 percent of British women do not want to marry a weak man, who sits down and cries the moment there is a problem.
They say: No, such a man looks more like a woman. We want a manly man. Wife beating is a serous accusation (leveled against Islam).
Let us examine this matter bit by bit.

Cleric Sa’d Arafat:
Allah honored wives by instating the punishment of beatings.

Commentator:
Honored them with beatings? How is this possible?

Cleric Sa’d Arafat:
The Prophet Muhammad said: “Don’t beat her in the face, and do not maker her ugly.” See how she is honored. If the husband beats his wife, he must not beat her in the face. Even when he beats her, he must not curse her. This is incredible! He beats her in order to discipline her. In addition, there must not be more than ten beatings, and he must not break her bones, injure her, break her teeth, or poke her in the eye. There is a beating etiquette. If he beats to discipline her, he must not raise his hand high. He must beat her from the chest level. All these things honor the woman.

She is in need of disciplines.

How should the husband discipline her? Through admonishment. If she is not deterred, he should refuse to share the bed with her. If she is not repentant, he should beat her, but there are rules to the beating. If is forbidden to beat her in the face or make her ugly. When you beat her, you must not curse her. Islam forbids this.

Commentator:
With what should he beat her? With his bar hand? With a rod?

Cleric Sa’d Arafat:
If he beats her, the beatings should not be hard, so that they do not leave a mark. He can beat her with a short rod. He must avoid beating her in the face or in places in the head where it hurts. The beatings should be on the body and should not come one right after the other. These are all choices made during the process, but beatings are allowed only as a last resort. The honoring of the wife in Islam is also evident in the fact that the punishment of beating is permissible in one case only: when she refuses to sleep with him.

Commentator:
When she refuses to sleep with him?

Cleric Sa’d Arafat:
Yes, because where else could the husband go? He wants her, but she refuses. He should begin with admonishment and threats…

Commentator:
Allow me to repeat this, A man cannot beat his wife …  over food or drink.

Cleric Sa’d Arafat:
Beating are permitted only in this case, which the husband cannot do without.